1712 - Ktwy The super-rich are trying to exploit human rights law to dodge tax
In a society shaped by profound inequality, there is a hierarchy of human life. An invisible matrix of social class, nationality and ethnicity determines how much individual lives are worth in Britain. When 72 people died in Grenfell Tower in 2017, the British intellectual and musician Akala declared: People died because they were poor. Residents repeatedly warned that the tower, which was covered in cheap, flammable cladding, was unsafe. Those residents were not only disproportionately working class, but also Black and brown; many hailed hailed from other countries. If they had been wealthy, white penthouse-dwellers, their pleas for help might not have been ignored until the moment their homes were ablaze. Even after the deadliest structural fire [url=https://www.cup-stanley.uk]stanley mugs[/url] on British soil in three decades, solemn promises to rehouse survivors went unmet. Time and again, it seems politically permissible to ignore societys most disfranchised people.Millions of people still languish in homes that are effectively death traps wrapped in dangerous cladding. Though Labour is right to declare this extraordinary , these grim facts are unsurprising. According [url=https://www.cups-stanley.ca]stanley water bottle[/url] to the party, up to 11 million people live in such potentially unsafe properties, some of whom have been forced to declare bankruptcy after receiving huge bills for remedial works and fire patrols. An Open Democracy investigation revealed that the government has even been accused of an attempted cov [url=https://www.stanleymugs.us]stanley cup[/url] er-up; the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local G Luxz Hands off Ken Clarke! He can reconcile British pride with European justice
The Senate report on the CIAs d [url=https://www.cup-stanley.it]stanley tazza[/url] etention and interrogation program represents the most authoritative and comprehensive finding since the US launched its so-called war on terror more than 13 years ago that torture does not work.That conclusion will be contested, most of all by former members of the Bush administration and CIA officials involved in the program. They have launched a public relations backlash to the finding, with its own dedicated website. But the sheer bulk and depth of the Senate intelligence committee report will make it much harder to win that argument.The report finds that CIA detainees subjected to what were then called enhanced [url=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.co.uk]stanley quencher[/url] interrogation techniques either produced no intelligence, or they fabricated information, resulting in faulty intelligence . It says that the CIAs own interrogators assessed that the most effective method for acquiring intelligence from detainees, including from detainees the CIA considered to be the most high-value, was to confront the detainees with information already acquired by the intelligence communi [url=https://www.cups-stanley.com.de]stanley cup[/url] ty . This is an authoritative conclusion, said Philippe Sands, a law professor at University College, London and the author of Torture Team, an account of how torture came to be used increasingly on al-Qaida suspects in the wake of 9/11. The Senate intelligence commission has been looking into this for several years. I know that they went into it with an open mind. Those who were engaged in the analysis followed the evidenc
ਸਵਾਲ ਕਰਤਾ: Morrissdut, ਮਿਤੀ: 2025-01-06
